Misleading and deceptive advertising is prohibited in Halacha under the interdict against creating a flase impression -geneivat da'at.
There is a dispute among Talmudic decisors as to where we the principle of geneivat da'at is derived from the Torah. R. Jonah b Anraham Gerondi in his Shaarei Teshuva (Spain, 1200-1264) says it is derived from the prohbition of lying. R. Yom Tov Ishbili, the Ritva, (Spain, 1250-1330) contends that it falls under the prohibition against theft.
What would be the practical difference between deriving it form lying or from theft?
Rabbi Levine does not get into this question. I have not studied the topic thoroughly myself, but I would guess that the difference would be the accountability that someone guilty of geneivat da'at would be held to. accept in certain cases of purgery, in Jewish law it is hard to hold someone accountable in court for an mere words that were not accompanied by an action. If however it constitutes theft, then perhaps a person can be judged as if he stole property with his hands.
michael kors handbags
ReplyDeletemichael kors outlet handbags
coach outlet online
moncler outlet
mac cosmetics
zumba dvd
barbour jacket
uggs for sale
uggs on sale
canada goose jackets sale
north face jackets sale
woolrich outlet
cheap ugg boots
tory burch outlet online
toms shoes
coach outlet
kevin durant shoes
cheap jordans
burberry outlet
north face jackets
patagonia jackets
coach purses outlet
uggs uk
air max pas cher
belstaff jackets
cheap beats by dre
oakleys sunglasses
ugg boots sale uk
nike kd vi
nike high heels
north face outlet
uggs for sale
patagonia outlet
red bottom shoes
jimmy choo shoes
شركة تعقيم وتطهير العين
ReplyDeleteشركات تعقيم ضد كورونا في العين