Showing posts with label E07 Avital Chizhik. Show all posts
Showing posts with label E07 Avital Chizhik. Show all posts

Friday, November 15, 2013

Panel Discussion with Avital Chizhik and Fania Oz Salzberger

This Shabbos, journalist Avital Chizhik will be our guest on Good Shabbos Nebraska - America's favorite Shabbos morning talk show.  Avital is known for many things, including a letter defending Orthodox Judaism against comments made by iconic Israeli author Amos Oz. 

Yesterday I was promoting Avital's visit on twitter, when I got an interesting reply to one of my tweets. 
"Hasn't this misquotation gone a bit too far?"
The tweet was from @faniaoz - Fania Oz Salzberger.  She is the daughter of Amos Oz, the coauthor of his latest book, and a famous Israeli historian, writer, and thinker in her own right. 

Fania first encountered Avital Chizhik a few years ago when Avital was working on her senior thesis at Yeshiva University.  The subject of her thesis was the memoir of her favorite Israeli author, Amos Oz.  She emailed both Oz himself and Fania when doing her research with a few questions.  Oz and Fania both responded generously, but they never met in person. 

A few months ago they had another encounter.  Amos Oz and Fania had just completed their joint project, Jews and Words.  In an interview on Israeli TV Amos Oz referred to Orthodox Judaism as a "fossil."  Avital wrote an amazing piece responding to this challenge (posted here). 

This time it was Fania who reached out to Avital.  They had some interesting email exchanges, and each one left the conversation with respect for the other, and following each other on twitter.

When I included @avitalrachel in my tweets yesterday, @fania noticed and decided to join into yet another conversation with Avital.

I responded to her tweet,
"not sure what you mean, but we would love to have you on the show to explain.  Ever been to Omaha? @goodshabbosneb"
 To which she responded,
"would love to come to Omaha and discuss this on stage with Avital, whom I deeply respect."
I checked her earlier twitter feed and lo and behold - it turns out that today, she is in St. Louis giving a lecture at the JCC!  St. Louis is a short 45 minute flight from Omaha!  She could come out Friday and be here on Good Shabbos Nebraska for Shabbos!

So I reached out to her in private message.  I gave her my phone number and told her to call me so that we could make it happen.

In the meantime she tweeted the following,
"My co-author and I have no "offensive remarks" vs. Jewish Orthodoxy, let alone women like Avital." 
She read my blog!!!!!  Fania Oz Salzberger is officially a reader of Amerabbica! 
But it also means that I had published something that was possibly inaccurate and seemingly offensive to someone.  That is never my intent so immediately I wrote,
"I am publicly retracting that tweet and personally apologizing if I was offensive in any way."
I then changed the word on my blog post from "offensive" to "provocative."
She replied,
"Gratefully acknowledged, dear Rabbi Jon.  Never been to Omaha (but my co-author has find memories."
A minute after, my phone rang.  It was her!
She was in St Louis, but unfortunately she was going to be in New York for Shabbat by her aunt and then back to Israel.
We had a very pleasant conversation.  She said that she definitely would love to come to Omaha and be a guest on Good Shabbos Nebraska next time.  Her father was a scholar in residence in 2003 at Temple Israel in Omaha and he has fond memories. 

I told her that we had interacted before.  About a year ago she and her father were on a live broadcast of the 92nd street Y promoting their new book.  We were watching it in the JCC in Omaha.  When it came time for questions, my wife Miriam submitted a question by text, and that question was the subject of about 20 minutes of discussion between her and her father.  They kept referring to the questioner as "Omaha." 

She said that she remembered well.  She remembered thanking Miriam for the question and told me to thank her again.

So after we established that she could not be our guest this Shabbos, I asked her when she would be in the states next.  She told me she would be here again in March.  So I suggested that we host in New York a panel discussion with her and Avital Chizhik.  She told me that she would definitely want to do that.  She said that she was recently at the GA in Israel and she sat on a panel with Rabbi Jonathan Sacks.  While she enjoys hearing him speak very much, he tends to be very politically correct and it is hard to have a real argument with him, but she would enjoy talking more to Avital because she thinks the two of them could have some honest and open dialogue that everyone present would benefit from.

So stayed tuned for March 2014 - Avital Chizhik and Frania Oz Salzberger in NYC.

And don't miss Season 1 episode 7 of Good Shabbos Nebraska - Shabbos 10am ONLY at Beth Israel Synagogue - Where every Shabbos is a shabbaton!

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Amos Oz - who are you calling a fossil?

This Shabbos Good Shabbos Nebraska will host journalist Avital Chizhik. The following is an excerpt from her iconic defense of Orthodox Judaism against the provocative comments of Amos Oz. 


Sometimes it takes only one word to strike you so deeply that you find yourself returning to it again and again. Recently, I’ve been haunted by a singular word choice, happened upon in an interview with Amos Oz, a long-time literary role model of mine.
In light of the recent publication of his "Jews and Words," a book he co-wrote with his daughter Fania Oz-Salzberger, Oz comments on Jewish tradition: “When those people [the ultra-Orthodox] say ‘the real Jewish tradition,’ they have in mind not the living and kicking Jewish legacy, but a fossil.”
A fossil. Certainly, as the authors wryly preempt in the epilogue, "Jews and Words" may irk the Orthodox reader and the believer, with its celebration of Jewish literature as it is understood by “atheists of the Book.” But it’s not the book’s irreverence that I found problematic. It’s the claim of secular ownership over debate, the assumption that traditional, "fossilized" observance must preclude one’s ability to ask radical questions.
I've always found it amusing that the secular world sees Orthodox Jews as those who live with utter conviction. Perhaps it’s a simple deduction to make, watching us sway over our books and close our eyes in prayer. But I’ll tell you a secret belief of mine, from the Inside:
It’s impossible to live this lifestyle of ours both quietly and consciously.
Because as much as our texts are steeped in debates and questions, so are our daily lives and most minute thoughts. We breathe our literacy. Indeed, as Oz and Oz-Salzberger so poignantly describe, we are obsessed with this, but in no way have we “forgotten the spirit of questioning that the Talmud once knew.”
I invite you to enter our yeshivas and our Sabbath tables, our forums and journals and Facebook feeds too, where we debate this very stuff of fossils; try to hear yourself think over the din of hundreds of Orthodox Jews arguing passionately. Paleontologists have yet to find a fossil, that remnant of a distant era, with as loud a heartbeat as this one.
It’s a lifestyle devoted to major moral questions – all the time. To be a consciously religious Jew requires a certain measure of intellect, an ability to constantly think, to never tire of asking and seeking meaning.
Debates arise beyond our study halls, but in the rituals that govern our daily lives. I encounter questions every day only because of these rituals – the very ones that I am told by the secular world are hopelessly backwards, a "convenient abstraction."
“What is this commandment to you?” they ask us, smirking. And sometimes I stay quiet because I myself am still deciding what these commandments mean to me, and at other times I stay quiet because I’m not sure I’ll be able to fully convey just how deeply, achingly, important I find these traditions.
The questions probably begin, like most things, with prayer – the punctuation mark of the Orthodox Jew’s day. Regardless of circumstance, we put everything aside and turn eastward several times a day to recite the same ancient words, every time.
But why pray, if it’s all by rote? Why force myself to say these words if I don’t feel in this moment that I’m literally convening with the Divine? I often set the prayer book down and recite the words from memory, pretending the words aren’t dictated but rather come from inside – and even if I do feel the words deeply, when a sudden phrase seems to articulate a most wordless thought, how will I know if there’s an answer? Sometimes I know He is listening, and other times a wall is a wall is a wall, and no matter how many prayers I try to place into it, it remains still – what then?
And every morning, I can’t help but wonder about this uniform of the Orthodox woman that I continue to choose: knee-length skirt, long sleeves, high neck. It’s not just about modesty – there’s also something of a statement in this dress code, because when I step out onto Madison Avenue in mid-July and realize I’m the only obvious Jew, I feel different, incurably so. I’m inevitably reminded of my Otherness, and part of me cringes as other women give my sleeves quizzical looks –- “Honey, did you check the forecast today?” – and I’m reminded not only of some values I strive to stand by, but also of this heightened sense of alienness. Even if no one else notices, I still feel bound to this name and identity; if I’d just change my clothing, perhaps I’d be free of this, perhaps I’d blend in with the rest of the enlightened world and breathe freely and never think twice about the way I’m perceived.
Thus a simple walk in Manhattan provokes a barrage of questions: Why be an Other, and why not be "like all the other nations?" Why suffer this endless Diaspora syndrome, the way my parents and grandparents did in the streets of Kiev? Dear God, now this uniform makes me an obvious Orthodox Jew – now I ought to be extra careful and smile and be polite and offer my seat to others on the subway, to set a good example as a Daughter of Israel lest someone starts a pogrom. Constant, constant consciousness – perhaps bordering on neurosis, too.
More questions arise as we avert our eyes from the forbidden and push away temptations. At a dinner party, a cafe, a gallery opening, a young well-dressed foreigner walks over to chat. The music is getting louder, and he’s leaning in closer and from the look in his eye, I know that I have approximately six minutes to slip away before he tries to put his hand on my waist and invites me for a drink. For a fleeting moment I consider it, then compose myself and walk away before I get caught up in the heat of the music, but as I walk away, I wonder: A 21-year-old girl living in New York City, forbidden from so much as a hand on her waist? Medieval, puritanical! Who am I, to cite my teachers and insist that touch is powerful, if I know nothing of it?
And even as the sun sets on Friday, when we turn off our phones and laptops and suddenly there is peace in the house, every small gesture transforms into a Sabbath gesture, and then into a potential debate: the halakha determines the way we greet each other, the way we sort silverware, the way we pour tea. When my father raises his glass to say kiddush over the wine, week after week, he invokes God’s creation of the world and the redemption from Egypt. But what is this Sabbath, what can I learn from the story of Creation, and how is this related to Egypt – where does one find freedom, in this day of restrictions? In the afternoon, I read Torah passages that spark more difficult questions: A commandment to wipe out Amalek? Why, genocide! A woman's oath is subject to be overridden by her father’s or husband’s wish? Misogyny! Endless descriptions of animal sacrifices? Irrelevant! A frantic search through rabbinic commentaries offers thousand of years of others before me, confronting the same questions and positing their own answers – what is morality?
Who are we to decide what is moral, in the face of Ultimate Truth? And how can I understand these concepts without altering the original into something entirely different, without taking the easy way out and brushing off these texts as irrelevant?
And then there are questions that arise because of the communities we’ve constructed for ourselves. Try living in a society of rigid norms without quietly questioning, try learning the language of each community without a healthy dose of humor. Orthodoxy is diverse, but we know enough about one another to know which conversations are allowed at which table. In one place I can reference a Talmudic passage without being considered a radical feminist, in another place I can discuss emotion without being deemed simple. Here, I can say "Gut Shabbes" to other religious Jews and here I shouldn’t, here I can wear red and here I can wear all black – heaven forbid that I mix the two up. And why all these rules, is there a value to these social standards that we silently laugh at? Must I define myself by my community, and what of the children I want to raise, what schools shall I send them to? What of our leadership, those who are too careful to call the emperor’s new clothes for what they are, and what of those schoolteachers who are so pious about the Law and not about human interactions – how does one rise above hypocrisy, preserving one’s ideals without being discouraged?
Here, what small gesture doesn't emerge as a question? Perhaps if I were to lead another life, my mind would be relatively quieter: no questions to constantly grapple with, no angels to wrestle, no desperate search for meaning in tradition either. Because here, every latte requires a pause and a blessing, every first morning glimpse a nod of thanks, every mezuzah a kiss of acknowledgement: constant, constant consciousness is demanded of us. Faith is far from "convenient;" it’s all-encompassing, a sincere choice that needs reaffirming daily. Our turbulent pursuit of meaning is in no way restricted to the sanctuaries and libraries of scholars, but it exists at our tables, in our kitchens, our offices and bedrooms and gardens. I often feel that, like the symbols and motions of the Passover Seder table, the rituals of Orthodox Judaism are almost predisposed to provoking questions and seeking answers: Is it not pulsating with vibrancy? Is this really the life of a fossil, a ‘living museum’ of family heirlooms relegated to the attic?
Calling another tradition a "fossil" has unpleasant implications. It’s faintly reminiscent of the language Sir Arthur Toynbee used in his 1934 writings on the Jews, and it renders the other as barely relevant, silent, extinct.
Last week, MK Ruth Calderon spoke elegantly about the Torah not being the property of any stream. Indeed, let the same be said about questions. Do not insist on monopolizing the right to question – secular brethren, as much as the Orthodox should not write you out of the story, I humbly ask that you do not write the Orthodox out of this story either. Do not deny our part in this great national conversation by dismissing our ability to think critically as well.

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Haaretz on Good Shabbos Nebraska

This week Good Shabbos Nebraska - America's favorite Shabbos morning talk show - will feature special guest Avital Chizhik, a columnist for Haaretz, Israel's most widely read daily newspaper. 

Avital, 22, gained recognition as a serious journalist for a story on the intriguing and mysterious case of the library of Rabbi Yitzchak Shneerson, the 6th Lubvaitcher Rebbe.  The library was seized almost 100 years ago by the Bolsheviks and eventually landed in the archives of Moscow’s national Lenin Library.  Since then, the some 15,000 volumes have been the subject of a bitter property dispute that has been a source of tension between the U.S. and Russian governments.  Because of the dispute, for the last two years Russians have refused to loan any artwork to American museums, fearing that once the pieces enter the U.S they will be seized and used as leverage to ransom the Shneerson Library.
.
Avital is an Orthodox Jewish woman, the daughter of Russian immigrants, and she speaks fluent Russian.  Her background and language skills uniquely positioned her to do research on the case both here and in Russia.  Her piece was published by Tablet Magazine in September of 2013 and has subsequently appeared in many other publications.

For Haaretz, Avital writes pieces of human interest that give her readers a glimpse into the lives of interesting famous, and sometimes not so famous, Jewish personalities, as well as a perspective from foreign and exotic communities and cultures.  Among those exotic cultures that Avital writes about is the world of the young Orthodox Jewish woman.  It is widely believed that there is a divide in Israel between secular and religious Israelis, and that the two sides have little exposure to one another.  Avital has established herself as an articulate, sophisticated, and at times sassy voice for Orthodox Jewish women in a newspaper that caters to a mostly secular audience. 

She gained international attention with a piece that she wrote earlier this year responding to a comment by Israeli author and cultural icon Amos Oz.  When talking in an interview about his latest work he referred to Orthodox Jewish tradition as a “fossil,” and suggested that those who identify as Orthodox are incapable of intellectual curiosity or rational thinking.  Oz was, and remains, Avital’s greatest literary influence and the subject of her undergraduate thesis paper.  Never the less, Avital responded to Oz in a dignified and respectful piece that beautifully articulates the vibrancy of contemporary Orthodox Jewish thought. 

Avital is thrilled to be a guest on Good Shabbos Nebraska and hopes to write an article for Haaretz about our talk show Shabbos format and our community. 

For those who don’t know, Good Shabbos Nebraska is our weekly Shabbos morning talk show that features Torah, Jewish news, and exciting guests.  The show is not broadcast in any way and the only way to experience it is by coming to shul at 10am every Shabbos at Beth Israel synagogue – where every Shabbos is a Shabbaton!